Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  90-91 / 144 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 90-91 / 144 Next Page
Page Background

Falling Figure with Bird

, 2002

Reproduced from

Tyeb Mehta: Ideas Images Exchanges

, p. 229

Falling Figure with Bird

, 2003

Reproduced from

Tyeb Mehta: Ideas Images Exchanges

, p. 231

Falling Bird

, 2004

Present lot

his paintings was trussed, the bird who ought to have

spread his wings to fly was instead, tumbling down like

a rock. Describing the present lot, Dalmia writes: “...the

bone‒white bird sinks downwards its feathers echoing

dismembered hands separated by a calm blue sky,

clutching itself, as it seems to fall upon us. The gruesome

falling act, made even more surreal by the placid nature

of its backdrop, heightens the act of cruelty inherent in

the painting, and thus in nature.” (Dalmia, p. 25)

“Is this an image of a man and bird wrestling in contorted

embrace, all the way down their spiralling fall? What

bird is this, lost in fall, toppling, shockingly falling at and

even on top of us through a shift of gaze: its feathers

form a dismembered hand, clutching at feathers, cut

by a blue plane of sky.” (Ranjit Hoskote, Ramchandra

Gandhi et al.,

Tyeb Mehta: Ideas Images Exchanges

, New

Delhi: Vadehra Art Gallery, 2005, p. 42) Mehta dissects

the austere background into four cleanly defined colour

planes, which intersect to further splinter the falling

creature. Unlike the chaotic abyss of his earliest

Falling

Figure

, the present lot reflects influences of the Colour

Field paintings of American abstractionists which Mehta

encountered during his Rockefeller III Fund Fellowship in

New York in 1968. In particular, it was Barnett Newman,

whose “monochromatic fields of color and strong vertical

dividing lines proved critical for Mehta’s own pictorial

vocabulary.” (Edward Saywell,

Bharat Ratna! Jewels of

Modern Indian Art

, Boston: Boston Museum of Fine Arts,

2009‒10, p. 11)

This painting is striking for its minimalism and restraint.

By creating its own enigmatic narrative, it takes its place

alongside some of the most iconic Mehta works that are

much sought after by connoisseurs and collectors.

TyebMehta’s art was focussed on subjects that referred to

the complexities and dilemmas of the human condition.

From his iconic “falling figure” to the trussed bull, Mehta

explored a concise repertoire of subjects through an

artistic career marked by quiet intensity. Whether the

figures were human, animal or bird, they conveyed—at

times even screamed—a sense of disquieting torment

and trauma. These figures in crisis are at once, fantastical

and earth‒bound: unforgiving goddesses fighting

demons to the death, rickshaw‒pullers, trussed bulls, and

birds and humans hurtling through the void.

The present lot, a human and bird companion in free

fall, has its roots in Mehta’s

Falling Figure

series, which he

first began painting in the mid‒sixties. By the late‒1980s,

Mehta had begun morphing the falling figure with that

of a bird, a flurry of limbs and feathers, merging into a

strange, composite creature. Over the following decade,

the falling bird began to take centre stage. Mehta

elaborates, “I did the first drawing of the bird as far back

as 1983 but as I went along I generally began to feel

that the bird always flies so why not make it fall—it’s a

contradiction in terms. The bird can be made without

bringing in flying because that has a different kind of

body‒lifting movement. Falling means you have more

or less given up. It’s an interesting idea because I work

on fragmentation. It’s one of my preoccupations.” (Artist

quoted in Yashodhara Dalmia,

Tyeb Mehta: Triumph of

Vision

, New Delhi: Vadehra Art Gallery, 2011, p. 25)

Perhaps referencing the mythologies of Icarus and

Jatayu, or invoking the literature of Camus, because

Mehta was a well‒read artist, the painting presents a

worldview wrought with myths and juxtaposition, with

hints of the absurd. Mehta’s son, Yusuf points out that

the artist worked with oxymorons. The powerful bull in

Falling Figure

, 1965

Gold medal award winner at the First Triennale

of Contemporary World Art in New Delhi in 1968

Saffronart, 16 February 2017, lot 46

Sold for Rs 6 crores ($909,091)

Bird

, 1999

Reproduced from Ranjit Hoskote, Ramchandra Gandhi et

al.,

Tyeb Mehta: Ideas Images Exchanges

, New Delhi: Vadehra

Art Gallery, 2005, p. 221

Falling Figure with Bird,

1988

Saffronart, 19‒20 September 2012, lot 40

Sold for Rs. 9.63 crores ($1,817,000)

Humans and birds tumble into the abyss in cinematic descent. Fractured limbs and fluttering feathers are frozen in

moments of horror. From Mehta’s earliest gold‒medal winning

Falling Figure

of 1965, to the auction record setting

Falling

Figure with Bird

of 1988, Mehta gradually morphed man and bird to create a composite creature.

FALLING FIGURES AND FALLING BIRDS: A TIMELINE